Skip to content

MENU

HomeAboutContact

Arbitration Nation

A resource for litigators, in-house counsel, and arbitrators

Home » CFPB's Preliminary Report: Financial Consumers Can Only Avoid Arbitration By Using A Credit Union

CFPB's Preliminary Report: Financial Consumers Can Only Avoid Arbitration By Using A Credit Union

MustacheSnowman
By Liz Kramer on January 7, 2014
Posted in Arbitration Rules/Procedures, Litigation vs. Arbitration

Say it’s twenty degrees below zero outside, and you’d already seen boiling water turn into “snow” immediately upon making contact with the air, what would you do next?  Assuming you were all caught up on your Words With Friends games, you would read the 168-page initial report of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau about arbitration!  This well-written report is the CFPB’s preliminary findings about consumer financial arbitration, which is that agency’s homework assignment under the Dodd-Frank Act.  In short, the study does a nice job finding statistics where statistics are hard to come by, confirming some things that we all knew from reading the case law in the last few years, and shedding light in a few areas.

The study focused on the “front end” of arbitration — when arbitration is required by contracts, what the arbitration agreement says, who demands arbitration after there is a dispute, the dollar amount at dispute, and who is represented by counsel.  Not, in other words, who won.  It also focused on three specific types of financial contracts that consumers enter into: credit card agreements, checking account agreements, and general purpose reloadable prepaid cards (which I had never heard of before reading the report).

In the “not surprising” category are these findings:

  • “Nearly all” of the arbitration agreements reviewed prohibited class arbitration;
  • The American Arbitration Association is the venue of choice for most consumer financial arbitration agreements;
  • Larger banks are more likely to use arbitration clauses in their credit card and checking agreements than smaller institutions; and
  • Most of the arbitration agreements studied allowed parties to bring low-dollar claims in small claims court.

In the “really? a banana will freeze into something as hard as a hammer” category are these findings:

  • Overall, only 50.2% of outstanding credit card loans were subject to arbitration agreements. (This number may increase markedly in the coming year or so, now that a settlement-induced 42-month hiatus from arbitration agreements has expired for the four biggest issuers.  If those four issuers were using arbitration clauses in this study, 94% of all credit card loans would have been subject to arbitration agreements.)  Only 3.3% of credit unions used arbitration clauses in their credit card agreements;
  • A majority of the arbitration clauses studied explicitly delegated disputes about the enforceability of the arbitration agreement itself to the arbitrator (but a significant minority actually have “anti-delegation” clauses);
  • The average arbitration clause in a credit card agreements was just over 1,000 words and gets a low score on “readability” (but, to be fair, so would this blog…);
  • About 1/4 of arbitration clauses in credit card and checking agreements allow consumers to opt-out of arbitration within an early window of time;
  • Concepcion has had no discernible impact on arbitration clauses in credit card agreements, neither in their overall usage nor in how frequently they preclude class actions.  Both figures have stayed constant over the past three years (although there has been some increase in checking account agreements that provide for arbitration and preclude class arbitration);
  • Roughly half of consumers had counsel at some time during the arbitration proceeding;
  • Almost no individual cases in these categories had less than $1,000 in dispute.  In fact, the average amount in dispute between 2010-2012 was $38,726;
  • The AAA handles an average of 415 cases a year on these topics, the majority of which relate to credit card agreements, and half of those are debt collection disputes (while approx. 80 million credit card holders are subject to arbitration agreements and tens of millions have checking accounts requiring arbitration).  Most of those case are filed by the consumers;
  • About 3/4 of consumers who have counsel are represented by repeat players — lawyers who regularly represent consumers in financial arbitrations; and
  • Similarly, about 4/5 of companies in these disputes are represented by counsel who are repeat players.

This study gives Congress, and the rest of us, a better picture of how arbitration is being used in the financial industry.  The CFPB’s next report will cover these topics more comprehensively, as well as tackling other topics like class arbitration and the disposition of consumer arbitrations.

Tags: CFPB, checking account agreements, class action waivers, class arbitration, Concepcion, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, credit card agreements, delegation clause, incidence of arbitration agreements, payday loan, preliminary, report
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Liz Kramer

Liz Kramer current serves as Minnesota’s Solicitor General.  Previously, she was a partner at Stinson Leonard Street and the founder of the award-winning blog, ArbitrationNation.

Liz's Linkedin ProfileLiz's Twitter Profile
Related Posts
Making money with your side hustle
Making money with your side hustle, Hanging chalkboard with a dollar sign on weathered wood wall with text Side Hustle
Arbitration 101: Uber and (a Failed) Equitable Estoppel Argument
December 5, 2019
Witness Subpoena Type Represents Legal Duces Tecum Writ Of Summo
Witness Subpoena Type Represents Legal Duces Tecum Writ Of Summons 3d Illustration. Judicial Document To Summon A Person
Non-Parties Must be Physically in the Same Room as Arbitrators
October 6, 2019
Woman and sunset
Woman on bench and sunset - vacation background
Waving Goodbye to Arbitration
August 9, 2019

About this blog

ArbitrationNation was started by Liz Kramer in 2011. It has been repeatedly recognized as one of the best legal blogs in the nation.

Read More....

Email Subscribe

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn

Topics

Recognition

Recent Updates

  • The Oklahoma Supreme Court Gets Spooked, Refuses to Enforce a Consumer Arbitration Agreement
  • Cert Granted in a New(ish) Arbitration case —Henry Schein Part II
  • Arbitration 101: Arbitrator Disclosures (and Repeat Players)
  • More on Class Arbitrability, Even Though It’s So Last Decade
  • Arbitration 101: Uber and (a Failed) Equitable Estoppel Argument

Bookworm: What We're Reading

Arbitration Nation

A resource for litigators, in-house counsel, and arbitrators

RSS Twitter LinkedIn
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy
Copyright © 2023, Henry Allen Blair All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo