Skip to content

MENU

HomeAboutContact

Arbitration Nation

A resource for litigators, in-house counsel, and arbitrators

Inc. v. Cahill

Subscribe to Inc. v. Cahill via RSS

Defendant's Failure To Pay Arbitration Fees Cannot Stymie Claims Against It

By Liz Kramer on May 28, 2015
Posted in Arbitration Rules/Procedures, Litigation vs. Arbitration

Usually, when faced with a respondent who refuses to pay its share of the arbitration fees, a claimant simply pays both sides’ fees, so that the arbitration can proceed.  A new case out of the Tenth Circuit answers the question: what happens if it does not pay both sides’ fees?  Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v.

About this blog

ArbitrationNation was started by Liz Kramer in 2011. It has been repeatedly recognized as one of the best legal blogs in the nation.

Read More....

Email Subscribe

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn

Topics

Recognition

Recent Updates

  • The Oklahoma Supreme Court Gets Spooked, Refuses to Enforce a Consumer Arbitration Agreement
  • Cert Granted in a New(ish) Arbitration case —Henry Schein Part II
  • Arbitration 101: Arbitrator Disclosures (and Repeat Players)
  • More on Class Arbitrability, Even Though It’s So Last Decade
  • Arbitration 101: Uber and (a Failed) Equitable Estoppel Argument

Bookworm: What We're Reading

Arbitration Nation

A resource for litigators, in-house counsel, and arbitrators

RSS Twitter LinkedIn
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy
Copyright © 2025, Henry Allen Blair All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo