In American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, a divided Supreme Court today reversed the Second Circuit and held that plaintiffs may not invalidate an arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver merely because proving their claims on an individual basis would cost many times more than their potential recovery. In doing so, Justice
Supreme Court
SCOTUS Affirms Arbitrator's Decision To Allow Class Arbitration in Sutter
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Sutter today, unanimously holding that as long as the arbitrator bases a decision to allow or disallow class arbitration on the text of the parties’ agreement, her “construction holds, however good, bad, or ugly.” Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. ___ (June 10, 2013). The …
SCOTUS Hears AmEx III: Argument highlights
The Supreme Court heard arguments in AmEx III today, the case that presents the question whether an arbitration agreement precluding class actions can be invalid if it makes it impossible for plaintiffs to vindicate federal statutory rights (in this case, because individual antitrust cases would be prohibitively expensive). The full transcript is available here.…
DOJ Message to SCOTUS: Do Not Enforce Arbitration Agreements That Invalidate Federal Statutory Rights
On January 29, the U.S. Dept. of Justice filed an amicus brief supporting respondents in AmEx III, arguing that to enforce the class arbitration waiver would be to create a large loophole for important federal laws. The Solicitor General has also asked to argue at the hearing on February 27. To my knowledge, DOJ…
SCOTUS Slaps Sooners With Severability Doctrine
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court reminded the Oklahoma Supreme Court who is boss when it comes to the Federal Arbitration Act. In Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. Howard, 2012 WL 5895686 (U.S. Nov. 26, 2012), SCOTUS declared “It is a matter of great importance [] that state supreme courts adhere to a correct…
CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood: 8-1 SCOTUS Decision Finds Credit Repair Organizations Act Does Not Preclude Arbitration
In a very narrow decision today, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) does not preclude the arbitration of consumer suits alleging violations of that Act. CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, 565 U.S. ___ (2012). The 8-1 decision was written by (who else?) Justice Scalia, with a concurring opinion filed…
Precluding Arbitration in Legislation: Supreme Court Preview
Since the last post dealt with legislative overrides of arbitration agreements, this one will expand on that theme with a preview of an upcoming Supreme Court case. In CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, to be heard on October 11, the Supreme Court will decide whether Congress intended to prohibit arbitration of claims brought under a…